160 A. 27 ANDREW M. CHAPLIN APPELLANT FROM DECREE OF JUDGE OF PROBATE. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Androscoggin. Opinion, April 27, 1932. PROBATE COURTS. PLEADING AND PRACTICE. REFERENCE. A probate appeal may not properly be the subject of a reference. Probate appeals are of statutory origin, and must be conducted strictly according to the […]
Articles Tagged: 160 A. 27
ELWELL v. BORLAND AND SEXTON, 131 Me. 189 (1932)
160 A. 27 FRED W. ELWELL vs. CHAUNCEY B. BORLAND. FRED W. ELWELL vs. MARY LORD SEXTON. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Knox. Opinion, April 28, 1932. DEEDS. BOUNDARIES. REAL ACTIONS. EVIDENCE. A particular, specific and definite grant by metes and bounds can not be enlarged or diminished by a later general description. Nor is […]