122 A. 925
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Aroostook County.
Decided December 20, 1923.
Defendant’s motion that the verdict, which is adverse to him, be set aside and avoided, on the grounds that it offends the law, is against the evidence, and carries an excessive award of damages, is overruled.
The major premise of the case was one of credence between the immediate parties, and that closely disputed point of fact was settled in the jury’s province favorably to the conclusion for which the plaintiff contended. Another jury, on a similar record, might have found that the defendant never owed wages to the plaintiff, or that the latter already had been fully paid for caretaking at the lumberman’s supply camps on the shore of Telos Lake in the northern
Page 564
woods, and such a finding should seem to resist an attack made on the score of plain wrong. But that would not affect this situation.
The underlying issue being decided, in conformity to legal rules, the amount of damages was fixed appropriately enough. Motion overruled.
Nathaniel Tompkins, for plaintiff.
George E. Thompson, for defendant.
2012 ME 21 40 A.3d 380 ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF MAINE, INC., v. SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE…
2012 ME 24 40 A.3d 390 Franklin L. BURNELL Jr. v. Lynette D. BURNELL. Docket No.…
2012 ME 20 37 A.3d 295 Christopher J. McCORMICK v. Lawrence CRANE. Docket No. Cum–11–31. Supreme…
2012 ME 22 37 A.3d 300 Deirdre DUNLOP v. TOWN OF WESTPORT ISLAND et al. Docket…
2012 ME 23 37 A.3d 305 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Joshuah P. FARRINGTON. Docket No.…
2012 ME 19 37 A.3d 294 STATE of Maine v. Timothy Scott ROBBINS. Docket No. Oxf–11–354.…