HEBERT v. BISHOP BABBIN CO. ET AL, 136 Me. 520 (1940)

10 A.2d 720

MICHAEL HEBERT vs. BISHOP BABBIN CO. ET AL, TRUSTEES.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Aroostook.
Decided January 27, 1940.

In assumpsit for the purchase price of a carload of potatoes; plea the general issue, defense being that the purchaser was not the agent of defendant; verdict for the plaintiff.

The case comes up on a general motion for new trial.

The jury heard the testimony. There is evidence to substantiate their finding. Motion overruled. Arthur J. Nadeau,
for plaintiff. Pendleton Rogers, for defendant.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 10 A.2d 720

Recent Posts

ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF MAINE, INC. v. SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE, 40 A.3d 380 (2012)

2012 ME 21 40 A.3d 380 ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF MAINE, INC., v. SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE…

8 years ago

BURNELL v. BURNELL, 40 A.3d 390 (2012)

2012 ME 24 40 A.3d 390 Franklin L. BURNELL Jr. v. Lynette D. BURNELL. Docket No.…

8 years ago

McCORMICK v. CRANE, 37 A.3d 295 (2012)

2012 ME 20 37 A.3d 295 Christopher J. McCORMICK v. Lawrence CRANE. Docket No. Cum–11–31. Supreme…

8 years ago

DUNLOP v. TOWN OF WESTPORT ISLAND, 37 A.3d 300 (2012)

2012 ME 22 37 A.3d 300 Deirdre DUNLOP v. TOWN OF WESTPORT ISLAND et al. Docket…

8 years ago

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO. v. FARRINGTON, 37 A.3d 305 (2012)

2012 ME 23 37 A.3d 305 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Joshuah P. FARRINGTON. Docket No.…

8 years ago

STATE v. ROBBINS, 37 A.3d 294 (2012)

2012 ME 19 37 A.3d 294 STATE of Maine v. Timothy Scott ROBBINS. Docket No. Oxf–11–354.…

8 years ago