127 A. 903
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Androscoggin County.
Decided February 6, 1925.
Action upon a promissory note between the original parties; defense, want of consideration. The testimony of the defendant, if believed by the jury, warranted the verdict. The plaintiff was not present at the trial and his version of the transaction was not given in evidence.
The credibility of the defendant’s version was entirely within the province of the jury; and whatever our own view might be, if the duty to weigh the evidence was imposed upon the court, we find nothing in the record which warrants us in substituting our view for the conclusions of the jury. Motion overruled.
Tascus Atwood, for plaintiff. Frank A. Morey, for defendant.
2012 ME 21 40 A.3d 380 ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF MAINE, INC., v. SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE…
2012 ME 24 40 A.3d 390 Franklin L. BURNELL Jr. v. Lynette D. BURNELL. Docket No.…
2012 ME 20 37 A.3d 295 Christopher J. McCORMICK v. Lawrence CRANE. Docket No. Cum–11–31. Supreme…
2012 ME 22 37 A.3d 300 Deirdre DUNLOP v. TOWN OF WESTPORT ISLAND et al. Docket…
2012 ME 23 37 A.3d 305 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Joshuah P. FARRINGTON. Docket No.…
2012 ME 19 37 A.3d 294 STATE of Maine v. Timothy Scott ROBBINS. Docket No. Oxf–11–354.…