162 A. 784

ROLAND D. GRANT, LIBELLANT vs. AMY G. GRANT.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. York County.
Decided, November 3, 1932.

This is a libel for divorce from the bonds of matrimony. The libellant, on the theory

Page 500

that the prayer of his libel had been denied, took an exception. The exception was allowed, and has been argued at the bar. The bill of exceptions alleges in substance that denial of divorcement was contrary to the only reasonable conclusion which might be drawn from the entire evidence.

The judgment or decree denying divorce, though — as the bill of exceptions recites it — prima facie valid, is subject to vacation on direct attack, at the instance of the injured party, in an appropriate proceeding, for irregularities other than of a purely technical nature, in rendition.

For this reason, the exception is overruled without further consideration, and without prejudice. Exception overruled.

Willard Willard, for libellant.

Waterhouse, Titcomb Siddall, for libellee.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 162 A. 784

Recent Posts

ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF MAINE, INC. v. SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE, 40 A.3d 380 (2012)

2012 ME 21 40 A.3d 380 ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF MAINE, INC., v. SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE…

8 years ago

BURNELL v. BURNELL, 40 A.3d 390 (2012)

2012 ME 24 40 A.3d 390 Franklin L. BURNELL Jr. v. Lynette D. BURNELL. Docket No.…

8 years ago

McCORMICK v. CRANE, 37 A.3d 295 (2012)

2012 ME 20 37 A.3d 295 Christopher J. McCORMICK v. Lawrence CRANE. Docket No. Cum–11–31. Supreme…

8 years ago

DUNLOP v. TOWN OF WESTPORT ISLAND, 37 A.3d 300 (2012)

2012 ME 22 37 A.3d 300 Deirdre DUNLOP v. TOWN OF WESTPORT ISLAND et al. Docket…

8 years ago

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO. v. FARRINGTON, 37 A.3d 305 (2012)

2012 ME 23 37 A.3d 305 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Joshuah P. FARRINGTON. Docket No.…

8 years ago

STATE v. ROBBINS, 37 A.3d 294 (2012)

2012 ME 19 37 A.3d 294 STATE of Maine v. Timothy Scott ROBBINS. Docket No. Oxf–11–354.…

8 years ago