134 A. 563
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland County.
Decided October 4, 1926.
Exceptions to denial of writ of certiorari brought to correct alleged errors in law in decision of the Public Utilities Commission.
Petitioners sought redress, but the method chosen is not open to them. The law governing the action of the Public Utilities Commission, and regulating the conduct of litigants in the situation in which petitioners found themselves, after decision by the Commission, Sec. 55, Chap. 55, R. S., requires that further procedure shall
Page 521
be by alleging exceptions to the decision of the Commission, which are to be certified to the Chief Justice of this Court.
Litigants are entitled to know when the end of a contention is reached. If no exceptions are taken to the decision of the Public Utilities Commission, in a case such as this, the Utility can confidently assume the contention is ended. Exceptions overruled. Result to be certified by the Clerk of this court to the Clerk of the Commission.
Emery G. Wilson, for petitioners.
Charles E. Gurney, for Public Utilities Commission of Maine.
William B. Skelton and L. E. Thornton, for Castine Water Company.
2012 ME 21 40 A.3d 380 ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF MAINE, INC., v. SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE…
2012 ME 24 40 A.3d 390 Franklin L. BURNELL Jr. v. Lynette D. BURNELL. Docket No.…
2012 ME 20 37 A.3d 295 Christopher J. McCORMICK v. Lawrence CRANE. Docket No. Cum–11–31. Supreme…
2012 ME 22 37 A.3d 300 Deirdre DUNLOP v. TOWN OF WESTPORT ISLAND et al. Docket…
2012 ME 23 37 A.3d 305 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Joshuah P. FARRINGTON. Docket No.…
2012 ME 19 37 A.3d 294 STATE of Maine v. Timothy Scott ROBBINS. Docket No. Oxf–11–354.…