143 A. 915

CLARENCE M. BRADEEN vs. CHARLES C. FOWLER ET AL.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Waldo County.
Decided December 27, 1928.

In a case like this, involving only issues of fact, an extended opinion with discussion of reasons would have no value as a precedent. It is sufficient to say that the Court perceives no manifest error in the verdict of the jury. Motion overruled.

Buzzell Thornton, for plaintiff.

Ross St. Germain, for defendant.

Tagged: